|
|
Post by GuardianAngel1911-Admin on Dec 4, 2013 15:09:09 GMT
 Bourne is in the UK hiding from the CIA, the CIA attempts to capture him themselves and fail miserably forcing them to turn to MI6 for help. As Bourne moves thorough Britain, MI6 agrees to capture the rogue American agent and sends their best man after him. Agent 007, James Bond is put on the case. Once Bond gets his gun and car he sets off on Bourne's trail. Bourne knows he's being hunted but not by who, Bond knows what county Bourne is in and has a picture of him and that he's a dangerous man but no other details. In order to succeed Bond must bring Bourne back preferably alive to turn over to the CIA but has been ordered to kill Bourne if it's impossible to bring him in or it becomes too dangerous to. In order for Bourne to succeed he has to make his way not just out of the United Kingdom but across the globe to North Korea or kill Bond. MI6 can help narrow potential locations for Bourne but cannot give a specific location to Bond they can however get him access to vehicles and weapons caches. Bourne can use any means to escape but he cannot take a flight directly to North Korea and will have to country hop if he wishes to use planes, his only other options being sailing and driving, he also knows the location of various CIA weapons caches he can use. Can Bond defeat this rogue American? Or has he finally met his match. |
|
|
|
Post by Knukails on Dec 4, 2013 15:15:32 GMT
This sounds like it would make an awesome movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by GuardianAngel1911-Admin on Dec 4, 2013 15:25:37 GMT
I kind of tried to set it up in a way that makes sense for both their archetypes and series, Bourne is always on the run from people, and Bond is usually going after someone or hunting someone down or looking for an enemy organization, and in the most recent movie the plot started when Bond was hunting down the villain so yeah it basically turned into what a crossover movie would sound like.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowknight on Dec 4, 2013 19:01:31 GMT
Ok, well. I think that I'll side with Bourne. That said, I feel that he has a good chance of winning, Bond is good, but Bourne is practically in his element. The only advantage I see bond having in a strait fight (should they face off) is his gadgets, which haven't been specified what he is allowed.
|
|
|
|
Post by GuardianAngel1911-Admin on Dec 4, 2013 19:30:06 GMT
Well since this is the Bond era pictured he has a gun...and a car, however this Bond is as brutal as Bourne and has access to MI6 resources, assault rifles, rpgs, jets, anything MI6 has he has within reason, obviously no nukes or anything
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowknight on Dec 4, 2013 19:59:32 GMT
Well since this is the Bond era pictured he has a gun...and a car, however this Bond is as brutal as Bourne and has access to MI6 resources, assault rifles, rpgs, jets, anything MI6 has he has within reason, obviously no nukes or anything Ok, how good is Bond in hand to hand. Here is one thing I found on Bourne |
|
|
|
Post by MugiwaraBlair on Dec 7, 2013 19:24:36 GMT
In a straight CQC fight I think Bourne wins most of the time, like maybe 8 times out 10. In a firefight they should be roughly matched but if anything Bond could be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by GuardianAngel1911-Admin on Dec 7, 2013 19:52:27 GMT
Which is why this isn't quite a straight fight, where would the fun in that be.
|
|
|
|
Post by MugiwaraBlair on Dec 7, 2013 20:06:27 GMT
Well if you don't like Bond it'd be fun to watch him get his ass kicked, but ya  |
|
|
|
Post by GuardianAngel1911-Admin on Dec 7, 2013 20:09:54 GMT
True, still I figured a spy vs spy chase across the globe style conflict would be more fitting for these two. It's their thing
|
|
